Make Homepage
Advertise
Partners
About Us

 

  Subscribe to the Newsletter
 
 
HOMEPAGE NEWS SECURITY COLUMNISTS OP-ED ARTICLES INTERVIEWS BOOK REVIEWS

Friday, 10 February 2012
Turkey Europe Middle East Caucasus Central Asia Russia Americas Asia Book Store World Economy Energy
Kashagan: Possible Outcomes of the Kazakhstan Government Decisions
Rovshan Ibrahimov
Editor of USAK Energy Review

printable version
send your friend

Wednesday, 17 October 2007

The government of Kazakhstan has suspended work on the largest oil field Kashagan. The present in the Northern part of the Caspian Sea and is located in shallow water, the field is the largest found in the last decade oil source. Kashagan reserves are within 38 billion barrels. For the development of Kashagan consortium has been established, headed by the Italian ENI. In addition to the company in a consortium composed of Royal Dutch Shell, Exxon Mobil and Total, this belongs to 18.5% of the shares, ConocoPhillips with 9.3% and 8.3% of ownership of the Japanese Inpex and Kazakhstan KazMunayGaz.

 

Earlier, the Kazakh Company was not involved in the development of this major condensate, but as strengthening Kazakhstan and increase financial capacity, the government felt it necessary to change this situation.

 

With the development of Kashagan oil companies faced with some difficulties associated with the location of recoverable reserves. Finding Kashagan in the shallow part of the Caspian Sea does not allow the use of mobile drilling platform. In addition, this part of the Caspian Sea in winter-free, making it difficult to conduct drilling operations. In the investigation which, for the extraction of oil were built artificial island, which is planned for drilling operations.

 

Initiation of Kashagan has been repeatedly postponed by the Consortium for a variety of reasons. Recently ENI has again announced postponement of the life of the deposit from 2008 to 2010. In addition ENI announced increasing of expenditure on exploration of Kashagan.


That caused a negative reaction from the government of Kazakhstan, which agreed to take immediate action. First, Kazakhstan demanded that the consortium to change operator. In addition, Kazakhstan sued for environmental damage in the amount of 10 billion dollars.


But this requirement is not last, Kazakhstan calls for increasing share of the public company KazMunayGaz from the current 8.3% to 40%, that is, to directly supervise the work at the Kashagan.


Many analysts note parallels in the actions of the government of Kazakhstan to the actions of Russia Far East Sakhalin gas fields. At that time the operator operator Royal Dutch Shell on the field was forced to cede control of the Russian Gazprom.
In similarity solutions Russia and Kazakhstan are indeed common traits. Do not forget that the two countries formed after the breakup of the Soviet Union, which dominated the planned economy. Western companies at the time perceived as a weapon penetration of capitalism. But after the collapse of the Soviet Union more countries announced their intention to switch to a market economy.

 

 Kazakhstan, as the country has significant reserves of hydrocarbons, unable to develop their own appeal to help Western oil companies. As more opportunities and strengthen the economy, the country now is to develop the deposit. Not in the last place in the past to be a socialist and thus preserved the tradition of public administration and closed economy.

 

Now Kazakhstan is in a comfortable position to act freely in the case of Kashagan because of good condition of its economy. Kazakhstan will no longer need financial flows, and thus has an opportunity to maneuvers freely in their actions.

 

But there is another reason, which failed to draw in Kazakhstan requirements increase its share in the Kashagan. First of all, Kazakhstan is not worried about the fact that the country may face sanctions from Italy. Politically and economically Italy is not so strong as to have the opportunity pressure on the government of Kazakhstan.
Another reason is indirect dependence Italian projects of Kazakh oil. It should be noted that currently are Samsun-Ceyhan pipeline construction of the Italian and Turkish companies. This pipeline which runs through the whole of Turkey and connects ports on the Black Sea and the Mediterranean Sea was planned as an alternative to transporting oil through the Turkish straights. The passages of the tankers are severely restricted that could prevent a large number of transport oil. The solution was to build a Samsun-Ceyhan pipeline.


However, Russia on the construction of the pipeline Burgaz- Aleksandropolus could seriously disrupt plans for the Italian-Turkish consortium of Russian oil in the Samsun-Ceyhan. So expectations relate primarily in the Kazakh oil. In the investigation which it is likely that ENI will meet many requirements Kazakhstan government.


Russian and Kazakh experience reviewing contracts can be contagious, especially for Azerbaijan. This country has achieved independence in the energy plan and became a major alternative energy source for Western countries. Azerbaijan today is not limited to the sale of raw materials and develop industrial infrastructure in neighboring countries for the production of finished products and selling it to the world markets. It should be noted that Azerbaijan may wish to exercise its priority in the energy plan of action for their foreign policy goals. So the main challenge for Azerbaijan is the problem of decision-Karabakh problem. Azerbaijan can use the oil factor as the pressure on Western countries for a positive solution to the problem.


It should be noted that it is possible and the continued use of Russia and Kazakhstan and soon by Azerbaijan. Its can be also imagined joint actions by these states to achieve own objectives.

 

Rovshan Ibrahimov

rovsen@azerimail.net

http://www.turkishweekly.net/energy


"Statements of facts or opinions appearing in the pages of Journal of Turkish Weekly (JTW) are not necessarily by the editors of JTW nor do they necessarily reflect the opinions of JTW or ISRO. The opinions published here are held by the authors themselves and not necessarily those of JTW or ISRO.

Materials may not be copied, reproduced, republished, posted without mentioning the mark of JTW or ISRO in any way except for your own personal non-commercial home use. For the news and other materials republished by the JTW you must apply the original publishers. JTW cannot give permission to republish this kind of materials."


 OTHER COMMENTS OF ROVSHAN IBRAHIMOV

Previous Years' Comments

 USER COMMENTS

add comment

no comment
   TURKEY
   EUROPE
   MIDDLE EAST
   CAUCASUS
   CENTRAL ASIA
   RUSSIA
   AMERICAS
   ASIA
   AFRICA
   WORLD
   ECONOMY
   ENERGY
   INTERVIEWS
Kashagan: Possible Outcomes of the Kazakhstan Government Decisions Kashagan: Possible Outcomes of the Kazakhstan Government Decisions Kashagan: Possible Outcomes of the Kazakhstan Government Decisions Kashagan: Possible Outcomes of the Kazakhstan Government Decisions 
Journal of Turkish Weekly (JTW)
USAK House,
Ayten Sok. No:21
Mebusevleri, Tandogan, Ankara, Turkey